Home » Viewpoint: It’s Easier To Get A Gun Than A Job At Dominos

Viewpoint: It’s Easier To Get A Gun Than A Job At Dominos

by Cathy Brown
0 comment Donate

Two weeks after the funeral for Amerie Jo Garza, 10, the primary of the Robb Elementary College college students to be interred following the Uvalde mass taking pictures, I phoned the supervisor of my native Domino’s to inquire a couple of supply job.

Although I’ve by no means pushed professionally and have been out of the job market since turning 70, I felt assured about my probability of being employed. I’ve a sound driver’s license. I’m insured and have my very own automotive. Since my final quotation greater than a decade in the past my file has been clear.

So I used to be considerably shocked when the supervisor stated that whereas he wanted a driver and I gave the impression of a great candidate, he couldn’t rent me on the spot even had been I to ace my interview. First I’d need to cross a company background test.

“How lengthy would that take?” I requested.

“Two days,” he replied.

Roadblocks — even small ones — have an outsized impression on deterrence. They’re the kind of guardrails one may anticipate, following Uvalde and Lewiston, Buffalo and Las Vegas, Newtown and so many different communities, that ought to apply to working different doubtlessly deadly items of equipment.

I hung up the cellphone and regarded my choices. I dialed a Papa John’s not far-off.

“Do you conduct a background test as a part of your interview course of?” I requested the assistant supervisor.

“What do you imply?” he replied.

All he actually needed to know was if I’d be accessible to work a daytime shift, from 10 a.m. to five p.m. He inspired me to come back for an interview that day.

It’s all the time heartening when somebody acknowledges worth in your ability set, when imminent employment awaits. But it was onerous to disregard that this explicit Papa John’s has set its bar for hiring perilously low — about as little as that of federal regulation relating to the acquisition or possession of most firearms, even after adoption of the current gun-control laws.

Legally, there are limits to the automobiles I can take for a spin. My license — topic to periodic renewal — permits me to drive our Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid and Acura RSX, in addition to every other automotive, SUV, pickup or U-Haul-type truck that I purchase, lease or borrow for noncommercial use.

It doesn’t enable me to function a college bus or dump truck, each of which require a commercial-driver license and weeks, if not months of specialised coaching.

I suppose I may name my congressman and object to such licensure restrictions, arguing that they infringe upon my constitutionally assured private freedoms. However he’s a type of liberal Democrats, so I doubt he would assist me.

As an alternative, I spoke with Aziz Huq, a College of Chicago constitutional regulation professor who research the interaction between the Structure and particular person rights and liberties. I requested him why driver laws go uncontested whereas the Second Modification conjures up an absolutism amongst many gun-rights advocates that precludes nuance — that fails to tell apart, for example, between shotguns and assault-style weapons, or the suitable minimal age for possessing explicit firearms.

Frustratingly, the Structure offers little counsel. “Arbitrariness comes into the regulation,” Huq stated, “as a result of the [Supreme] Courtroom has by no means defined the way it is aware of what a compelling state curiosity is. Why is it a compelling state curiosity when the federal government fights terrorism, for instance, however not when it’s combating the pandemic?”

I requested him if he noticed any probability for stricter gun-reform laws.

“I don’t know,” he answered. “You’re asking a query about political morality.”

However in truth, legislators have positioned limits on quite a few so-called private freedoms within the identify of public security. We cross by necessary safety checks in airports and authorities buildings. We’re required to put on seat belts on airplanes, automobiles and rollercoasters.

Is it an excessive amount of to ask that firearms be handled in the identical, nuanced method as motorized automobiles? That there be one algorithm for proudly owning and carrying a handgun; one other for buying a semiautomatic, assault-style rifle; and a 3rd for the way a lot ammo a single clip might maintain?

To which one may add a fourth: Texas Sen. Ted Cruz informed Sky Information reporter Mark Stone, within the wake of the Uvalde killings, “If you wish to cease violent crime, the proposals the Democrats have — none of them would have stopped this.”

An extended-standing Democratic proposal has been to elongate the ready interval previous to finishing the acquisition of a firearm, permitting time to conduct a radical background/psychological well being test, and to erect a easy roadblock. Salvador Ramos, the Robb Elementary shooter, bought his first assault weapon shortly after he turned 18, one week earlier than he massacred these 19 college students and two lecturers — simply two days earlier than their faculty 12 months was to finish.

Had there been even a 10-day ready interval, Ramos’ assault may by no means have taken place.

Ron Berler, a John Jay Middle on Media, Crime and Justice reporting fellow, is the writer of “Elevating the Curve: A Yr Inside One among America’s 45,000 Failing Public Colleges.” This piece ran initially within the Houston Chronicle and is republished right here with the author’s permission.

Source / Picture: thecrimereport.org

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.