Home » The Execution of Ivan Cantu Is a Reminder of Why We Execute the Innocent and Always Will

The Execution of Ivan Cantu Is a Reminder of Why We Execute the Innocent and Always Will

by Eric Bennett
0 comment Donate
5
(1)

The Execution of Ivan Cantu Is a Reminder of Why We Execute the Harmless and At all times Will

Final Wednesday, the state of Texas doubtless executed an harmless particular person when it put Ivan Cantu to death. Sadly that is nothing new for either Texas or the United States.

In dying penalty states, executing the harmless is just a price they pay to maintain the equipment of dying operating. Nothing is ideal, in spite of everything, and as long as the error price in capital circumstances isn’t “too nice,” we glance away or fake that those that are killed acquired what they deserved.

We tolerate executing the harmless to place an finish to lengthy, drawn out capital circumstances. Doing so could present finality and a few semblance of closure to households of homicide victims.

We execute the harmless as a result of the Supreme Court docket tells us that nothing in our Constitution forbids it.

It’s long gone time to acknowledge that so long as we proceed to condemn individuals to dying, we’ll hold executing harmless individuals.

Texas did so when it executed Cantu by deadly injection for murdering his cousin and his cousin’s fiancée, James Mosqueda and Amy Kitchen, in November 2000. Because the Texas Tribunenotes, “Prosecutors pointed to bloody clothes present in Cantu’s trash can, stolen jewellery and the testimony from Cantu’s fiancée, Amy Boettcher, and her brother, Jeff Boettcher, to construct a case towards the defendant.”

Nonetheless, between the time he was convicted and in the present day, the case towards Cantu step by step unraveled.

First, 4 years in the past a police officer signed a sworn affidavit contradicting what Amy Boettcher stated about discovering bloody denims at Cantu’s house. Because the Tribune stories, “The denims had been too large for Cantu and assessments didn’t discover conclusive proof of his DNA on the pants.”

Amy Boettcher additionally testified that Cantu threw a Rolex watch belonging to Mosqueda out of a automotive window shortly after the murders. However, in 2019, Cantu’s legal professionals discovered that the police discovered the watch in Mosqueda’s house and had returned it to his household.

As detailed in Cantu’s last-minute request for a keep of execution from the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Boettcher additionally lied when she testified that Cantu proposed to her with Amy Kitchen’s engagement ring on the night of the murders.

Boettcher gave different false testimony, claiming that Cantu had dedicated the murders round midnight on November 3. Declarations from two forensic pathologists recommend that the killings occurred on the morning of Saturday, November 4, “based mostly on the onset and development of rigor mortis and livor mortis.”

Extra unraveling of the case towards Cantu occurred in 2021 when Jeff Boettcher admitted that he lied when he testified that Cantu recruited him to wash up after the murders and that he was a drug person when he gave that false testimony.

And, as too often happens in death cases, the state knew in regards to the issues with the Boettchers upfront of Cantu’s trial however went forward anyway.

When all of this got here to mild, three of the jurors who had voted to convict Cantu and sentenced him to dying got here ahead and stated that they’d not have finished so if that they had identified about these issues on the time of the trial.

One among them said, “Under no circumstances am I protesting the dying penalty, certainly not am I protesting our judicial system. I’m merely asking that this be checked out a bit of deeper earlier than the unripened fruit is taken off the tree.”

Even with Cantu’s new proof and the assist of a number of the very individuals who sentenced him to dying, on February 27, the ultra-conservative and death penalty friendly Fifth Circuit gave the green light for his execution. The court docket chastised Cantu, saying that “his claims may have been found years and even a long time in the past with the train of due diligence. And even when a few of his claims had benefit (although they don’t), he has not made a prima facie case that by clear and convincing proof, no cheap factfinder would have discovered him responsible of the 2 murders.”

However nothing that the court docket stated can obscure the truth that Individuals have not too long ago discovered so much in regards to the sorts of issues that plagued Cantu’s and different dying penalty circumstances.

A 2003 Gallup ballot asked, “How typically do you assume that an individual has been executed beneath the dying penalty who was, in actual fact, harmless of the crime she or he was charged with—do you assume this has occurred previously 5 years, or not?” 74% of the respondents reported that they believed that an harmless particular person had been executed throughout the final 5 years.

In a 2021 Pew survey, 78% of the respondents agreed that “there may be some danger that an harmless particular person will probably be put to dying, whereas solely 21% assume there are enough safeguards in place to stop that from occurring.”

And over the past fifty years, 197 individuals have been exonerated and released from death row. Twenty-one of these exonerations resulted from DNA testing.

Because the Demise Penalty Data Heart reports, between 1976 and 2021 for each 8.3 individuals sentenced to dying in the USA 1 was exonerated.

In 2014, Legislation professor Samuel Gross and his colleagues published a examine through which they tried to establish the variety of dying sentenced people who’re truly harmless. As they defined, “False convictions, by definition, are unobserved once they happen: If we all know {that a} defendant is harmless, he’s not convicted within the first place. They’re additionally extraordinarily troublesome to detect after the very fact. Because of this, the good majority of harmless defendants stay undetected.”

Gross additionally reminds us that the speed of exonerations amongst dying sentences in the USA is “far increased than for every other class of prison convictions. Demise sentences signify lower than one-tenth of 1% of jail sentences in the USA, however they accounted for about 12% of identified exonerations of harmless defendants from 1989 via early 2012, a disproportion of greater than 130 to 1.”

They estimate that “if all death-sentenced defendants remained beneath sentence of dying indefinitely, a minimum of 4.1% can be exonerated.”

At this time, there are greater than 2,300 individuals on dying rows throughout the USA. Making use of Gross’s determine means that 94 of them are harmless.

Texas alone has greater than 190 individuals awaiting execution. For Gross and his colleagues that implies that 7 or 8 of them shouldn’t be there in any respect.

In truth, Texas has the doubtful distinction of main the best way in relation to executing the harmless. The Demise Penalty Data Heart lists 20 cases (not together with Ivan Cantu’s) the place there may be what it calls “sturdy proof of innocence.”

Of these 20 circumstances, 10 come from Texas alone. On Wednesday when it put Ivan Cantu to dying, Texas added to that grim whole.

Writing simply over a century in the past in 1923, the well-known choose Discovered Hand said, “Our [criminal] process has at all times been haunted by the ghost of the harmless man convicted. It’s an unreal dream.” It’s time for this nation to awaken from that dream.

We should face the truth that we’ll proceed to execute the harmless so long as we proceed to execute anybody. That’s cause sufficient to cease executing in any respect.

Source / Picture: verdict.justia.com

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.