Home » US Supreme Court takes case on banning firearms from people subject to domestic-violence restraining orders

US Supreme Court takes case on banning firearms from people subject to domestic-violence restraining orders

by Derek Andrews
0 comment 3 minutes read Donate

The US Supreme Courtroom agreed on Friday to listen to a case asking whether or not banning firearms from folks topic to domestic-violence restraining orders violates the Second Amendment. The case is an attraction from the US Courtroom of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.The lawsuit particularly asks whether or not 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second Modification. In response to the petition for a writ of certiorari, that regulation makes it illegal for individuals topic to a court docket restraining order to own a firearm.

For the regulation in query to forbid somebody from proudly owning a firearm, a number of issues should happen. First, a court docket should concern an order after giving the individual discover and a chance to be heard. Subsequent, the court docket order should forbid the individual from harassing, stalking, or threatening an “intimate companion,” the individual’s youngster or an intimate companion’s youngster. Lastly, the order should both (1) embody a discovering that the individual poses a “credible menace” to the bodily security of the intimate companion or youngster or (2) explicitly prohibit the use, tried use or threatened use of bodily pressure towards the intimate companion or youngster.

The case, United States v. Zackey Rahimi, entails an individual who was topic to a home abuse-related court docket order and later concerned in a number of capturing incidents. The Fifth Circuit ruled that the regulation was unconstitutional. The court docket largely based mostly its choice on the Supreme Courtroom ruling final yr in New York Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen. In Bruen, the Supreme Courtroom struck down a New York state regulation prohibiting open carry in public locations, holding that the regulation did not move an originalist studying of the Second Modification.

The Fifth Circuit concluded that, though Rahimi was “hardly a mannequin citizen,” he was not a “convicted felon” or in any other case excluded from the Second Modification’s scope. Moreover, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the regulation violated the Second Modification on its face as a result of it did not comport to the nation’s “historic custom” below the Supreme Courtroom customary in Bruen.

The US, as petitioner within the case, argues that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling was incorrect and must be overturned. The US notes that the choice “threatens grave penalties for the security of victims of home violence, law-enforcement officers, and the general public.” A number of amicus briefs have been filed within the case, similar to California Governor Gavin Newsom’s brief in assist of america. Newsom’s transient argues that “the Fifth Circuit’s choice threatens the lives of numerous People, enabling fully foreseeable acts of gun violence.”

Source / Picture: jurist.org

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.