Home » US Supreme Court narrows employer’s ability to deny religious accommodations to employees

US Supreme Court narrows employer’s ability to deny religious accommodations to employees

by Derek Andrews
0 comment Donate
5
(1)

The Supreme Courtroom of the USA ruled Thursday in Groff v. DeJoy that challenges below Title VII of the Civil Rights Act for non secular lodging within the office would require employers to indicate considerably elevated prices. The Courtroom used this case to make clear a precedential case usually relied on in Title VII circumstances, and made it simpler for workers to hunt non secular lodging within the office.

The issue that confronted the Supreme Courtroom was the decrease courtroom’s reliance on the case Trans World Airways, Inc. v. Hardison, which set the usual of de minimus price for the employer. The case said that an employer solely wanted to accommodate non secular practices if doing so didn’t impose a considerable price that amounted to an undue hardship.

The Courtroom upheld the Hardison precedent, retaining the de minimus normal, however added readability as to its interpretation. The Courtroom emphasised that the Hardison take a look at ought to be used to contemplate all related components that go into undue hardship and that Title VII nonetheless requires that an employer “moderately accommodate” the chosen non secular practices of their workers. Subsequently, the employer has the burden of exhibiting that accommodating worker non secular requests would require a considerably elevated price to the enterprise to obtain an undue hardship exception.

Rating member of the Home of Representatives Committee on Schooling and the Workforce Robert C. Scott (D-VA), celebrated the ruling, saying:

Non secular freedom is a elementary American worth. Our civil rights legal guidelines defend employees from non secular discrimination and proactively require employers to offer lodging for non secular train. Right this moment’s Supreme Courtroom ruling in Groff v. DeJoy clarified employers’ obligation to offer these cheap lodging when an worker’s sincerely held non secular observances and practices battle with work necessities.

The case was introduced by Gerald Groff, who was an worker of the USA Postal Service (USPS) from 2012 till 2019. Groff identifies as an Evangelical Christian who, as a matter of non secular statement, is unable to work on Sundays. When Groff first started working at USPS, this was not a problem, however in 2013, USPS started facilitating deliveries for Amazon and requested their workers to work on Sundays as properly. Groff initially averted this requirement by transferring to a extra rural location, however ultimately, Amazon deliveries reached the agricultural workplace as properly.

Groff obtained “progressive self-discipline” for his failure to work Sundays, and ultimately resigned in 2019. He then introduced authorized motion towards USPS, alleging office non secular discrimination, protected below Title VII. The District Courtroom granted summary judgement to USPS, and the Third Circuit Courtroom of Appeals affirmed.

The case will now be remanded to the decrease courts for additional proceedings utilizing the clarified interpretation below Hardison.

Source / Picture: jurist.org

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.