Home » US civil and disability rights groups ask federal court to block provisions of Georgia voting law

US civil and disability rights groups ask federal court to block provisions of Georgia voting law

by Derek Andrews
0 comment 2 minutes read Donate

A coalition of civil and incapacity rights organizations filed an emergency injunction Wednesday with the Northern District of Georgia asking the court docket to dam two provisions of a Georgia voting regulation, SB 202, as a result of their influence on individuals with disabilities’ entry to voting. Asserting that the regulation unjustly burdens disabled individuals making an attempt to vote, the teams mentioned in a press launch {that a} preliminary injunction “would assist voters with disabilities have equal entry to absentee voting in Georgia within the upcoming 2024 elections and permit counties to once more present drop containers in areas which might be accessible.”

The 2 provisions in query impose restrictions on individuals’s means to assist voters with disabilities full a poll and counties’ means to offer drop-boxes at accessible areas and occasions. The teams argue that these provisions make it tougher for individuals with disabilities to vote by limiting measures that make voting extra accessible.

Zan Thornton, co-chair of the incapacity rights group Georgia ADAPT, careworn the necessity for an preliminary injunction, saying that “in 2022, ADAPT bought an avalanche of requests for rides from disabled individuals throughout Georgia who couldn’t forged their absentee ballots simply and wanted to journey to the polls as an alternative. That dramatic rise in limitations dealing with disabled voters of Georgia underscores the necessity for an injunction earlier than 2024.”

Georgia passed SB 202 in 2021 as a response to claims of voter fraud. It confronted vital opposition on the time, with one state legislator calling the regulation “Jim Crow 2.0.” Since then, each the US Department of Justice and the NAACP, a excessive profile civil rights group, have sought to dam the regulation in court docket. “Selecting to make entry to a elementary proper tougher is just not solely unlawful,” mentioned Devon Orland, litigation director for the Georgia Advocacy Workplace, “it’s the antithesis of the foundational pillars of democracy.”

Source / Picture: jurist.org

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 2

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.