Home » Hong Kong top court trials live broadcasting civil appeals to uphold judicial transparency

Hong Kong top court trials live broadcasting civil appeals to uphold judicial transparency

by Derek Andrews
0 comment Donate

The Hong Kong Courtroom of Last Attraction (CFA) conducted a reside broadcast on a civil attraction listening to on Wednesday. The live-broadcasting measures echoed the precept of judicial transparency the Chief Justice of the CFA Andrew Cheung proposed on the ceremonial opening of the authorized yr 2023.

The trial was of a civil attraction introduced by MK, searching for to challenge the Director of Authorized Help’s choice to withdraw authorized assist. MK had sought authorized assist to challenge the constitutionality of denying the fitting to marriage to same-sex {couples} below the Hong Kong regulation. The authorized assist was later withdrawn. Presently, the Authorized Help Rules impose on the aided celebration’s solicitor or counsel an obligation to report abuse of authorized assist. On Wednesday’s listening to, the CFA was tasked to think about whether or not the obligation abrogated the constitutionally protected proper to authorized privilege and if that’s the case, whether or not such abrogation is a obligatory implication.

Native media reported that the reside broadcasting operated easily because the viewers may hear the judges’ and counsels’ speeches clearly. Senior counsels for each events agreed that the reside broadcasting didn’t represent a big distinction to them because the courtroom tried reside broadcasting through the COVID-19 pandemic.

One other reside broadcasting will take place on January 16 in a case of land disputes. The CFA will hear submissions on whether or not the exterior partitions of a constructing represent a reserving half within the deed of mutual covenant in that case.

In January 2023, Cheung acknowledged that open justice is vital to sustaining public confidence within the judicial system and upholding the rule of regulation. He famous the significance of reside broadcasting as a instrument for public schooling on the judicial course of. He believed the reside broadcasting of judicial proceedings would scale back the events the place the general public makes uninformed and inaccurate feedback about judicial proceedings. He additionally emphasised the significance of due administration of justice and famous that not all proceedings, reminiscent of legal trials, are “inherently appropriate” for reside broadcasting.

Source / Picture: jurist.org

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.