Home » Europe human rights court orders Russia to pay $143M in damages for 2008 Georgia conflict

Europe human rights court orders Russia to pay $143M in damages for 2008 Georgia conflict

by Derek Andrews
0 comment 3 minutes read Donate

The European Courtroom of Human Rights Friday ordered Russia to pay roughly 130 million euros ($143 million) in compensation to Georgia, virtually 15 years after the battle within the South Caucasus.

The case involved allegations by the Georgian authorities that administrative practices by the Russian Federation amounted to breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Conference), in reference to the armed battle between Georgia and the Russian Federation in August 2008.

In its judgment, the court docket was tasked with awarding damages on the premise of “simply satisfaction.” Awarding cash to candidates by the use of simply satisfaction shouldn’t be a primary obligation of the court docket, however it does embody its function beneath Article 19 of the Conference of making certain that states adjust to the Conference. The court docket can award these damages beneath Article 41, the aim being to compensate the applicant for the precise dangerous penalties of a violation.

On this judgment, the court docket discovered that there was nonetheless a foundation to make an award beneath Article 41, even if Russia had ceased its membership with the Council of Europe, and didn’t cooperate with the proceedings.

Finally, the court docket’s award was calculated based mostly on numerous breaches of the Conference, which included:

  • Killing civilians in villages in South Ossetia and the “buffer zone”
  • Torching and looting of homes within the “buffer zone”
  • Arbitrary detention of Georgian civilians
  • Stopping the return of Georgian nationals to their respective properties in South Ossetia and Abkhazia
  • Failure to adjust to a procedural obligation to hold out an enough and efficient investigation into the deaths which had occurred through the lively part of the hostilities or after the cessation of hostilities

The court docket discovered that Russia’s practices amounted to “inhuman and degrading therapy” owing to the sentiments of anguish and misery suffered by the victims, who, furthermore, had been focused as an ethnic group.

This determination follows on from the January 2021 Grand Chamber judgment in Georgia v. Russia (II), which held, amongst different issues, that Russia’s invasion had breached the European Conference on Human Rights Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (safety of property), Article 2 (proper to life), Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading therapy), and Article 8 (proper to respect for personal and household life.

Source / Picture: jurist.org

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 4.5 / 5. Vote count: 2

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.