Home » Canada Supreme Court Justice Brown retires, halting personal misconduct probe

Canada Supreme Court Justice Brown retires, halting personal misconduct probe

by Derek Andrews
0 comment 3 minutes read Donate

Canada Supreme Courtroom Justice Russell Brown announced his quick retirement Monday, halting the continuing misconduct probe which has saved Brown off the bench since February. The probe, carried out by the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC), stemmed from an alcohol-fueled altercation at an Arizona resort in late January. Through the altercation, Brown was bodily assaulted by one other man, who alleged that Brown was harassing his feminine companions. The CJC is required to analyze complaints made in opposition to federally appointed judges.

In his assertion, Brown maintained his innocence within the affair, however reasoned that his continued absence from the courtroom would impose a severe obstacle on the courtroom’s work. “Whereas my counsel and I are assured that the grievance would have finally bene dismissed,” Brown asserted, “the persevering with delay is in no one’s curiosity – the Courtroom’s, the general public’s, my household’s or my very own.”

Each Brown and his authorized counsel did, nonetheless, elaborate on the accusations in opposition to him, which Brown’s illustration labelled a “spurious grievance” designed to “weaponize the CJC’s course of.” An announcement from Brown’s authorized counsel detailed proof from quite a lot of sources uncovered through the investigation, arguing that the complainant referred to as the police and filed a grievance with the CJC to “get forward” of the authorized implications of his personal conduct in direction of Brown. Their assertion highlights social media posts from the complainant’s two feminine companions which appeared to make gentle of the incident, in addition to the responding officer’s evaluation of the complainant as being “argumentative, hostile [and] antagonistic” resulting from intoxication.

With Justice Brown’s retirement, an impartial and non-partisan advisory board will likely be shaped to hunt and overview purposes to fill the vacant Supreme Courtroom place. On account of guidelines governing provincial illustration on the bench, Brown’s substitute should additionally hail from Western Canada. The board will then present a brief listing of candidates to the prime minister, who additionally receives suggestions from the minister of justice, in session with the chief justice of the Supreme Courtroom. Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will then make the ultimate choice.

Source / Picture: jurist.org

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.