Home » Canada railway workers union challenges labour board back-to-work order

Canada railway workers union challenges labour board back-to-work order

by Derek Andrews
0 comment 2 minutes read Donate
0
(0)

The union representing employees from Canada’s two largest rail corporations filed a court challenge towards a labour board order requiring them to return to work. The order was issued after the Teamsters Canada Rail Convention entered right into a lockout final week.

Staff at Canadian Nationwide (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas Metropolis (CPKC) briefly started a lockout on August 22. The Teamsters Canada Rail Convention, the union representing CN and CPKC employees, accused the businesses of negotiating in dangerous religion concerning the remainder intervals and shift scheduling. President of Teamsters Canada Rail Convention Paul Boucher said:

All through this course of, CN and CPKC have proven themselves keen to compromise rail security and tear households aside to earn an additional buck. The railroads don’t care about farmers, small companies, provide chains, or their very own staff. Their sole focus is boosting their backside line, even when it means jeopardizing all the economic system.

Frightened concerning the penalties of a chronic lockout of rail employees on the economic system, Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon instructed the Canada Labour Relations Board (CIRB) to order binding arbitration and for the employees to return to work. Though the putting employees did return on August 26, they’re difficult this resolution, stating in a press launch:

These selections, if left unchallenged, set a harmful precedent the place a single politician can bust a union at will. The proper to collectively cut price is a constitutional assure. With out it, unions lose leverage to barter higher wages and safer working situations for all Canadians. We’re assured that the regulation is on our facet, and that employees may have their voices heard.

The problem, comprising 4 appeals in Canada’s Federal Courtroom of Attraction, seeks to invalidate the Minister’s order and the CIRB ruling. The appeals argue that the CIRB didn’t comply with a good process in reaching its conclusion and violated the employee’s proper to freedom of affiliation beneath the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Source / Picture: jurist.org

Donation for Author

Buy author a coffee

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

@2023 LawyersRankings.com. All Right Reserved.